Thus far I have not written a word about my in-laws, and fortunately for me, they had a similar background and parenting style to that of my parents. They were very good people, from humble beginnings with a wealth of experience and kindest of hearts. They were hard working, wise and very brave. They had a huge impact on my life. I married their 2nd son, who was a “new and improved” version of both of his parents and I was fortunate to have been loved and valued by this family. In the bargain, I was blessed by several brothers-in-law and sisters-in-law, nieces and nephews who enriched my life along the way.
My mother in-law, Ruth:
Ruth was born in England and grew up in Montreal. As a young woman she went to work in a millinery, making hats. She was petite, beautiful and very lively. She loved ballroom dancing, stamp collecting, skiing and pen pals. She married Frank in 1936 and had four boys, in four years. The youngest was a few months old when Frank joined the war effort. He was sent to England and then to the front as a motorcycle dispatch rider for the duration of the war.
Ruth’s story takes an interesting turn during that period of time.
She had already experienced the effects of war, as a child of a military man in WW1. Now, her husband was away, fighting WW2. It seemed to be just the way it was! With four youngsters, she lived in a flat in a working class section of the city. Her best friend, Anne, a native girl with two young children, lived on the second floor. Their husbands were both overseas with the Black Watch.
One spring day, as they sat on the front stoop, watching their older children play on the narrow, dusty, sidewalk, they decided that it was not going to be!
Two city girls ventured into the unknown with their little tribe.
They rented a cottage for the summer. The cottage was on an island and they had to row a boat to the main land to pick up their mail and groceries, once or twice a week. They took turns. Ruth would take one of her quietest boys with her because she was terrified of water and having him with her, gave her the courage and calm to get on with the chore and not freeze up mid way. The summer was a healthy, happy one and when fall came the mothers knew they could not return to city life. They each found suitable houses to rent in a little Laurentian town where they lived until, thankfully, the husbands returned five years later.
It wasn’t easy, but Ruth was well organized and open minded, so she learned fast and managed. People in the small town watched out for families of the military. The local butcher set aside kidney and liver, which was hard to sell in those days, and she knew the value of it. He would give her soup bones with plenty of meat attached for a second meal. She was a good cook, and had a nice garden, so the children thrived. They could ski in winter and run through the woods and fields in summer. They had each other.
Imagine what an effect this story had on me! I learned that we were not prisoners of our history, circumstance and environment. We can forge through fear and create a new reality. She did.
Ruth had three more children after the war and retained her sense of humour. I rarely saw her unhappy. After years of living and working in mining towns, they finally returned to city life. We remained close, if not physically, spiritually.
I understood what a unique person she was, when, as a young married couple, we would visit Ruth and Frank and she would spot a ” tense situation” happening between us. She would ask in front of both of us “well, what has he done now?” Coming from a mother in-law, I don’t need to describe the effect of those words. Among her many talents, she was a psychologist too.
Twenty years have passed by since Ruth died. We remember her fondly and often and we hope that she knows how grateful we are to have enjoyed her gracious “company” in our lives.
